Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, Mike Mascari <mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
Date: 1999-08-25 00:08:29
Message-ID: 199908250008.JAA21741@srapc451.sra.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>I have just committed changes into current (but not REL6_5) to make

Just for a confirmation: I see REL6_5_PATCHES and REL6_5 Tag in the
CVS respository. I thought that REL6_5_PATCHES is the Tag for the 6.5
statble tree and would eventually become 6.5.2. If so, what is the
REL6_5 Tag? Or I totally miss the point?
--
Tatsuo Ishii


Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 1999-08-25 00:17:03
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1999-08-24 21:14:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group