Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
Date: 1999-08-24 03:59:51
Message-ID: 199908240359.XAA15470@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> At the very least, couldn't vc_vpinsert() double
> vpl->vpl_num_pages whenever vpl->vpl_num_pages
> needs to be expanded instead of expanding linearly
> by PG_NPAGEDESC, or by the original 100?

This seems like a good idea.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-08-24 04:13:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-08-24 03:50:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group