Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: SAKAIDA <sakaida(at)psn(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
Date: 1999-06-26 15:51:41
Message-ID: 199906261551.LAA10079@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > 
> > > SAKAIDA wrote: 
> > >    However, I think that there is no necessity of calculating the 
> > > value of 1000 digits in the 'LOG' function.  
> > > 
> > 
> > numeric/decimal is a new type for this release.  I assume this extra
> > processing will be removed once we are sure it works.
> 
>    Thank you for your reply. At the next version, I hope that
> 'regression test/bigtest' ends in the short time. 
> 
>    The patch as an example which I considered is the following.
> If this patch is applied, the processing which requires 1.5 hours
> in the current ends for 5 minutes.

Just don't run bigtest.  It is only for people who are having trouble
with the new numeric type.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 1999-06-26 15:55:55
Subject: Re: utf-8
Previous:From: Chris BitmeadDate: 1999-06-26 15:29:45
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Severe SUBSELECT bug in 6.5 CVS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group