> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > > SAKAIDA wrote:
> > > However, I think that there is no necessity of calculating the
> > > value of 1000 digits in the 'LOG' function.
> > >
> > numeric/decimal is a new type for this release. I assume this extra
> > processing will be removed once we are sure it works.
> Thank you for your reply. At the next version, I hope that
> 'regression test/bigtest' ends in the short time.
> The patch as an example which I considered is the following.
> If this patch is applied, the processing which requires 1.5 hours
> in the current ends for 5 minutes.
Just don't run bigtest. It is only for people who are having trouble
with the new numeric type.
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 1999-06-26 15:55:55|
|Subject: Re: utf-8 |
|Previous:||From: Chris Bitmead||Date: 1999-06-26 15:29:45|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Severe SUBSELECT bug in 6.5 CVS|