On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 02:18:13PM +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> I'd suggest *not* adding this non-SQL92 feature. afaik it adds no
> functionality, so why bother messing with it? btw, OpenIngres1.1 did
> not have this syntax either.
I agree. My only reason for maybe adding it was that I wasn't sure about
SQL92. But if it definitely is not in SQL92 I think we shouldn't bother. But
then we have some other compatibility hacks too.
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(dot)Meskes(at)gmx(dot)net | Use PostgreSQL!
In response to
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Craig Orsinger||Date: 1999-06-16 21:33:06|
|Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation|
|Previous:||From: Georg Ritter||Date: 1999-06-16 18:32:18|
|Subject: IE5 & jdbc |