Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pg_parg system table is suffering from software rot

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_parg system table is suffering from software rot
Date: 1999-03-26 16:33:55
Message-ID: 199903261633.LAA09212@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Does anyone know what the system table pg_parg is, was, or might be
> used for?
> 
> A comment at the head of include/catalog/pg_parg.h says
> 
>  * [whatever this relation was, it doesn't seem to be used anymore --djm]
> 
> and as far as I can tell this is true --- the source code contains
> no references to pg_parg or any of the field names therein.  The table
> is utterly undocumented, but it looks like it might once in the distant
> past have represented proc argument types, which we now keep elsewhere.
> 
> The table is suffering from bit rot, in that its "parproid" field
> contains OIDs of rows in both pg_proc and pg_operator.  Rather than
> trying to intuit what it is for enough to fix this, I propose just
> deleting the darn thing.  Do I hear any objections?
> 

House-clean away.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 1999-03-26 16:38:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum slowness
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-03-26 16:25:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New regress test (was Re: Timespan_div misbehaving?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group