Re: [GENERAL] Transaction logging

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: michael(dot)davis(at)prevuenet(dot)com (Michael Davis)
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Transaction logging
Date: 1999-02-24 03:02:07
Message-ID: 199902240302.WAA02346@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> What would it take to have transaction logging added to Postgres. I am a
> c/c++ programmer and will consider contributing to the Postgres development
> effort. I really like everything I see and read about Postgres. As a
> result, I am strongly considering Postgres as the database engine for my
> Membership database application. My customer is willing to invest in a
> commercial database, but most of the commercial databases I have briefly
> looked at fall a little short in one way or another. I have several
> concerns/needs that I am willing to implement and/or support:
>
> - Outer join support in views

In the works. Perhaps for 6.5, probably not.

>
> - Transaction logging
>
> - Some form of mirroring, shadowing, or replication
>
> - The current locking mechanism is of some concern. I need to make
> sure that one user can read a record and then a second can read and update
> that same record.

MVCC locking in 6.5. Will do what you need.
>
> - If the first user attempts to update that record, what happens?

Hard to explain. Will wait or update a copy while read's use an older
copy fo the row.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message strawman 1999-02-24 04:29:17 timestamps
Previous Message Peter T Mount 1999-02-23 22:12:27 Re: [GENERAL] Transaction logging

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-02-24 03:02:57 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails
Previous Message Daryl W. Dunbar 1999-02-24 01:39:09 RE: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot