Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: hal(at)enteract(dot)com, docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site
Date: 1999-01-07 17:47:34
Message-ID: 199901071747.MAA07054@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
> Looks nice. Might rephrase:
> 
>   Those of you who did not like
>   our table-level locking will be pleasantly surprised.
> 
> to be something like
> 
>   Those of you wanting alternatives to
>   our table-level locking will be pleasantly surprised.
> 
> The new CASE statement might be of interest, and I'm looking forward to
> getting far enough along on outer joins to get a mention of that too :)

Yes, CASE would be good to add.  You can say:

	An SQL-standard CASE statement is planned too.


Thomas, do you need help on outer joins?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-01-07 17:54:11
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-01-07 17:31:06
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1999-01-07 17:49:57
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long
Previous:From: Jackson, DeJuanDate: 1999-01-07 17:31:56
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group