Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: dave(at)turbocat(dot)de, ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long
Date: 1999-01-07 03:53:51
Message-ID: 199901070353.WAA26872@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

> > Wish I knew the answer. I can guess, but that isn't going to help.
>
> Guess == throwing in ideas, even if they are incorrect...the way I
> figure it, I through out alot of guesses...some of them spark ideas in
> others and we see some really neat ideas come out of it :)

Yes. Good. I have been bugging Vadim about possible row reuse, but I
don't know enough to understand the options.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-01-07 04:38:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-01-07 03:08:40 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-01-07 04:38:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-01-07 03:08:40 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long