From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL functions, INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE RETURNING, and triggers |
Date: | 2006-10-12 22:07:49 |
Message-ID: | 19990.1160690869@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> ISTM that ideally, a query with RETURNING ought to act like a SELECT
> for the purposes of a SQL function --- to wit, that the result rows are
> discarded if it's not the last query in the function, and are returned
> as the function result if it is.
The current state of affairs is that the first part of that works as
expected, and the second part fails like so:
regression=# create function foo8(bigint,bigint) returns setof int8_tbl as
$$ insert into int8_tbl values($1,$2) returning * $$
language sql;
ERROR: return type mismatch in function declared to return int8_tbl
DETAIL: Function's final statement must be a SELECT.
CONTEXT: SQL function "foo8"
regression=#
While this is certainly undesirable, it looks more like a missing
feature than a bug, especially since the documentation says exactly
that:
... the final command must be a SELECT that returns whatever is
specified as the function's return type.
I spent some time looking at what it would take to fix it, and I find
that the changes are a bit bigger than I want to be making in mid-beta.
So my recommendation is that for now we just add a TODO item:
* Allow SQL-language functions to return results from RETURNING queries
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-10-12 22:15:03 | Re: Hints proposal |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-12 22:03:38 | Re: New version of money type |