Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 type substitute ?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: honza(at)ied(dot)com (Jan Vicherek)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 type substitute ?
Date: 1998-12-27 19:17:15
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> /me goes red in face. 10 seconds after I sent this off I found
> contrib/int8. That would answer one of my questions -- I.e. it would be
> reasonably simple to add my own data type. If somebody feels like
> answering the other questions too, please go ahead.
>    Jan

6.4.* already has int8 support included, if your compiler supports it. 
When you run configure, it checks to see if 'long long' is int8, and if
so, enables int8 data types.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 1998-12-27 21:20:57
Subject: Web site mirroring trouble
Previous:From: Jan VicherekDate: 1998-12-27 18:35:35
Subject: Re: int8 type substitute ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group