Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 type substitute ?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: honza(at)ied(dot)com (Jan Vicherek)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 type substitute ?
Date: 1998-12-27 19:17:15
Message-ID: 199812271917.OAA03807@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> 
> /me goes red in face. 10 seconds after I sent this off I found
> contrib/int8. That would answer one of my questions -- I.e. it would be
> reasonably simple to add my own data type. If somebody feels like
> answering the other questions too, please go ahead.
> 
>    Jan

6.4.* already has int8 support included, if your compiler supports it. 
When you run configure, it checks to see if 'long long' is int8, and if
so, enables int8 data types.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 1998-12-27 21:20:57
Subject: Web site mirroring trouble
Previous:From: Jan VicherekDate: 1998-12-27 18:35:35
Subject: Re: int8 type substitute ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group