Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: memory leak with Abort Transaction

From: SHIOZAKI Takehiko <takehi-s(at)ascii(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: memory leak with Abort Transaction
Date: 1998-11-26 12:40:19
Message-ID: 199811261240.VAA27516@libpc01.pb.ascii.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello!

Releasing 6.4.1 is a good news.
But would you confirm the following "memory leak" problem?
It is reproducable on 6.4 (FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE).

Regards

[On Nov 13, takehi-s(at)ascii(dot)co(dot)jp (SHIOZAKI Takehiko) writes:]
>Hello!
>
>A background postgres porocess gets larger with Abort Transactions.
>Memory seems to leak.
>This occurs also on 6.3.2.
>
>You can see it with user aborts:
>
>========================================================================
>#!/bin/sh
>
>yes 'begin;
>abort;' | psql regression
>========================================================================
>
>And with internal aborts:
>
>========================================================================
>#!/bin/sh
>
>yes "insert into Room (roomno) values ('000');" | psql regression
>========================================================================
>
>Regards
>
>-- 
>ASCII CORPORATION
>Technical Center
>SHIOZAKI Takehiko
><takehi-s(at)ascii(dot)co(dot)jp>


-- 
ASCII CORPORATION
Technical Center
SHIOZAKI Takehiko
<takehi-s(at)ascii(dot)co(dot)jp>

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 1998-11-26 13:01:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: memory leak with Abort Transaction
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 1998-11-26 10:37:28
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] cursor and update + view

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group