Re: [HACKERS] Bug in 6.4 release

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in 6.4 release
Date: 1998-11-24 03:51:21
Message-ID: 199811240351.WAA24164@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > This new patch uses scankeys instead of throwing the indexqual to the
> > executor. This is probably more efficient, but I am not sure about the
> > other ramifications. It still fails.
>
> This wouldn't handle functional indices in OR...
>
> So, I added indexqualorig list to the IndexScan node:
>
> indexqual = fix_indxqual_references (indexqualorig)
>
> - indxqualorig' Var-s references heap tuple...
>
> Regression tests are ok.
> Patch made for CURRENT tree - let me know if there will
> be problems with 6.4...
>
> It's better to gmake clean in backend dir...
>
> Patch also fixes EXPLAIN for indices in OR: all indices
> used are explained now.
>
> Vadim

Thanks very much. I have applied this to the stable branch, because
without it, we get backend crashes.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-11-24 03:53:53 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in 6.4 release
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-11-24 03:50:42 Re: [HACKERS] What happened to FAQ_Linux, FAQ_Irix?u