Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Date: 1998-10-29 04:20:09
Message-ID: 199810290420.XAA05544@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Actually, the darn thing is *crawling* with bugs.
> 
> Guess BETA3 won't be the release, eh? *grin*

I can see an argument for letting it go for 6.5, but if it is broken,
and is showing up in regression testing, I think we have to fix it.

We can't fix it in 6.4.*.  No initdb for that.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-10-29 04:32:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-10-29 04:09:28
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group