Re: [HACKERS] psql's help (the LIMIT stuff)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql's help (the LIMIT stuff)
Date: 1998-10-26 03:06:52
Message-ID: 199810260306.WAA05080@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Seems like it would be a nice minor release item, but the problem is
> > that minor releases aren't tested as much as major ones. How confident
> > are you in the code? What do others thing?
>
> I regression tested it, and did additional tests in the
> SPI/PL area. It works. It only touches the parser and the
> executor. Rules, planner/optimizer just bypass the values in
> the parsetree. The parser and the executor are parts of
> Postgres I feel very familiar with (not so in the optimizer).
> I trust in the code and would use it in a production
> environment.
>
> It's below.

Haven't forgotten about this. Planned for the first minor release after
6.4. Hopefully I will have a cnf'ify/OR/palloc fix by then too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-10-26 05:34:09 Re: [HACKERS] datetime regression test fails at daylight savings transitions
Previous Message Thomas A. Szybist 1998-10-26 02:46:53 Re: [HACKERS] Last call?