Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jhickey(at)impact1(dot)hpcc(dot)nectec(dot)or(dot)th (Justin Hickey)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)
Date: 1998-10-09 02:46:07
Message-ID: 199810090246.WAA07839@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Hello Bruce
> 
> On Oct 8,  5:40pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have removed the data/base/*/pg_version file because it was never
> > used.  We had removed the 'version' functions long ago, but
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Does this mean that the following from the FAQ is wrong?
> 
> 	3.25) How do I tell what PostgreSQL version I am running?
> 
> 	From psql, type select version();
> 
> If so then this question should probably be changed to point users to the
> PG_VERSION file.

No, the version command was removed.  I should not have said version
function.  select version() works just as always.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: D'Arcy J.M. CainDate: 1998-10-09 04:15:23
Subject: CIDR type and functions
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-10-09 01:10:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more static/NOT_USED functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group