Applied.

Thomas, did remove the README.ip, or did you leave it when you decided
to merge it into the docs.  I still show it here, so I am renaming it.



> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> 
> > 	*Please* make the appropriate changes and submit a patch...it
> > should be listed as CIDR, not as IPADDR.  MACADDR, IMHO, is okay, as its
> > the only way I've ever heard of it being referred...but I do not consider
> > IPADDR to be correct terminology...
> 
> I agree.  I think, though, that the best argument presented in the
> debate was from Paul Vixie, who wanted INET to be the name covering
> both IPV4 and IPV6.  The following kit makes the needed changes:
> 
> WARNING!  This posting contains two separate patch kits, to be applied
> at different times, renaming a couple of files in between them!  The
> steps to be taken are marked with "[***]".
> 
> [***] First apply these patches to change ipaddr to inet.  Affected files are:


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers at 1998-10-07 09:28:08 from Tom Ivar Helbekkmo

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers at 1998-10-08 07:16:24 from Thomas G. Lockhart

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 1998-10-08 00:23:50
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 1998-10-08 00:12:15
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items