Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Portability Issue in src/backend/port/snprintf.c (I think)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ridderbusch(dot)pad(at)sni(dot)de (Frank Ridderbusch)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Portability Issue in src/backend/port/snprintf.c (I think)
Date: 1998-10-07 17:14:07
Message-ID: 199810071714.NAA02118@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Hi,
> 
> I compiled Sundays snapshot in preparation of a SVR4/SINIX Readme. A
> couple of the problems, which I saw, have already been addressed by
> the recent UnixWare patch.
> 
> Admittedly my operating system platform is somewhat old, however I
> would think, that there are more os versions out there, which don't
> have a 'long long' data type.
> 
> In particular my compiler didn't like the following line in
> src/backend/port/snprintf.c:
> 
> /* IRIX doesn't do 'long long' in va_arg(), so use a typedef */
> typedef long long long_long;
> 
> I'm on a simple 32bit architecture with no long long support, so I
> changed 'long long' to 'long' and everything was okay.

Good point.

I have fixed snprintf.c so it properly works on machines that don't do
'long long'.  I used HAVE_LONG_INT_64 defines around the proper areas.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-10-07 17:56:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous:From: Horak DanielDate: 1998-10-07 12:03:35
Subject: NT port of PGSQL - success

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group