Re: [GENERAL] status on IPv6 implementation...

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com (Jackson, DeJuan)
Cc: lorhuerta(at)yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, lorenzo(at)nmsu(dot)edu
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] status on IPv6 implementation...
Date: 1998-10-07 02:43:33
Message-ID: 199810070243.WAA07529@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was just wondering if the IPv6 datatype has allready been
> > implemented on the current version of postgres.
> It should be in the CVS version, if you want to test it.
> -DEJ

Just a clarification. The new INET/MAC type in 6.4 will not have IPv6
capability, but is planned for 6.5.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-07 02:46:50 Re: [GENERAL] Regex problems
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-07 02:41:21 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)