| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and more |
| Date: | 1998-10-06 22:08:59 |
| Message-ID: | 199810062208.SAA03639@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Hi,
>
> Bruce: Would you please apply the patch at the end?
>
> Terry: Sorry, but dumping views is covered completely by this
> approach for dumping rewrite rules.
>
> Playing around with pg_dump for a while resulted in some
> fixes, enhancements and some found bugs not yet fixed. After
> all I was able to get useful results when dumping/reloading
> the regression database.
I have backed out Terry's patch, and applied this.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-10-07 02:41:21 | Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |
| Previous Message | Terry Mackintosh | 1998-10-06 21:18:11 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and more |