Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: taral(at)mail(dot)utexas(dot)edu (Taral)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Date: 1998-10-02 17:40:39
Message-ID: 199810021740.NAA15196@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > > Create a temporary oid hash? (for each table selected on, I guess)
> >
> > What I did with indexes was to run the previous OR clause index
> > restrictions through the qualification code, and make sure it failed,
> > but I am not sure how that is going to work with a more complex WHERE
> > clause.  Perhaps I need to restrict this to just simple cases of
> > constants, which are easy to pick out an run through.  Doing this with
> > joins would be very hard, I think.
> 
> Actually, I was thinking more of an index of returned rows... After each
> subquery, the backend would check each row to see if it was already in the
> index... Simple duplicate check, in other words. Of course, I don't know how
> well this would behave with large tables being returned...
> 
> Anyone else have some ideas they want to throw in?

I certainly think we are heading in the direction for a good general
solution.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-10-02 17:58:25
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 1998-10-02 17:31:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Martin SchulzeDate: 1998-10-02 17:56:18
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: More PostgreSQL stuff
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 1998-10-02 17:31:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group