| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | tih(at)nhh(dot)no (Tom Ivar Helbekkmo) |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID |
| Date: | 1998-10-02 05:34:36 |
| Message-ID: | 199810020534.BAA28216@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> There's been a very recent change to include the OID in certain names
> in the system table. Do a "select * from pg_amop;" to see what I
> mean: the values for amopselect and amopnpages didn't have the OID
> appended before. Was this change intentional? If so, I'm really
> curious as to why... And what's the best way to find out, from SQL,
> that 'btreesel' should now be 'btreesel_1268'?
I have just fixed this.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Taral | 1998-10-02 05:35:12 | RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-10-02 05:28:26 | regproc fix |