> There's been a very recent change to include the OID in certain names
> in the system table.  Do a "select * from pg_amop;" to see what I
> mean: the values for amopselect and amopnpages didn't have the OID
> appended before.  Was this change intentional?  If so, I'm really
> curious as to why...  And what's the best way to find out, from SQL,
> that 'btreesel' should now be 'btreesel_1268'?

I have just fixed this.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

• Names that suddenly include an OID at 1998-09-11 08:36:57 from Tom Ivar Helbekkmo

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Taral	Date: 1998-10-02 05:35:12
	Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 1998-10-02 05:28:26
	Subject: regproc fix