From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | meskes(at)online-club(dot)de (Dr(dot) Michael Meskes) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] struct index |
Date: | 1998-08-19 14:42:14 |
Message-ID: | 199808191442.KAA22904@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Is there a reason why anyone renamed struct index to
> struct RelationGetRelidindex in ecpg's type.h? I'm surprised it doesn't
> break the ecpg compilation procedure since the usage in preproc.y hasn't
> been changed at all.
>
> I just checked and found that is does indeed break ecpg compilation. I just
> didn't notice because ecpg isn't compiled per default. Any reason why it
> isn't?
>
> Michael
Sorry. I am fixing it now. I am not sure how that got changed, but I
clearly did it:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** type.h 1998/05/26 13:43:55 1.10
--- type.h 1998/08/19 01:33:47
***************
*** 75,81 ****
char *str;
};
! struct index
{
int index1;
int index2;
--- 75,81 ----
char *str;
};
! struct RelationGetRelidindex
{
int index1;
int index2;
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-19 14:44:30 | Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1998-08-19 14:03:53 | Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work |