Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] struct index

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: meskes(at)online-club(dot)de (Dr(dot) Michael Meskes)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] struct index
Date: 1998-08-19 14:42:14
Message-ID: 199808191442.KAA22904@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Is there a reason why anyone renamed struct index to
> struct RelationGetRelidindex in ecpg's type.h? I'm surprised it doesn't
> break the ecpg compilation procedure since the usage in preproc.y hasn't
> been changed at all. 
> 
> I just checked and found that is does indeed break ecpg compilation. I just
> didn't notice because ecpg isn't compiled per default. Any reason why it
> isn't?
> 
> Michael

Sorry.  I am fixing it now.  I am not sure how that got changed, but I
clearly did it:
	
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

	*** type.h      1998/05/26 13:43:55     1.10
	--- type.h      1998/08/19 01:33:47
	***************
	*** 75,81 ****
	        char            *str;
	  };
	  
	! struct index
	  {
	      int index1;
	      int index2;
	--- 75,81 ----
	        char            *str;
	  };
	  
	! struct RelationGetRelidindex
	  {
	      int index1;
	      int index2;


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

  • struct index at 1998-08-19 07:13:18 from Dr. Michael Meskes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-08-19 14:44:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 1998-08-19 14:03:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group