Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development), pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-interfaces)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names
Date: 1998-08-06 05:27:53
Message-ID: 199808060527.BAA25883@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
> Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
> 
> I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
> namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
> 
> However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
> object users.  As I see there are going to be other new large object
> things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
> 
> Is is OK to rename them internally?

I will probably keep the current names for a few releases.  Once
interfaces start using the relkind field to identify them, rather than
the xinv* naming, I will be able to change the names to anything else
and no external interface will care.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter T MountDate: 1998-08-06 05:34:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend
Previous:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 1998-08-06 05:19:58
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large objects

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Peter T MountDate: 1998-08-06 05:59:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-08-06 03:53:58
Subject: Large objects names

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group