Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change

From: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change
Date: 1998-07-22 05:22:31
Message-ID: 199807220522.OAA19383@srapc451.sra.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
>At 11:32 AM 98.7.13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumnus(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
>>> Should we ask Tatsuo to do some mixed-endian tests, or is
>>> that area completely unchanged from v6.3?
>>
>>I don't think I broke anything in that regard ... but more testing is
>>always a good thing.  If Tatsuo-san can spare the time, it would be
>>appreciated.
>
>Ok, I think I can start the testing next week.

I did some cross-platform testing today against 7/18 snapshot. The
platforms tested are:

1. Sparc/Solaris 2.6
2. PowerPC/Linux
3. x86/FreeBSD
4. x86/Linux

They workd fine!

P.S.
I noticed that 6.4 client did not talk to 6.3.2 server.

[srapc451.sra.co.jp]t-ishii{157}



Connection to database 'test' failed.
Unsupported frontend protocol.[srapc451.sra.co.jp]t-ishii{158} 

I thought that we have kept the "backward compatibility" since we
introduced "protocol version" in libpq?


Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: JohnDzDate: 1998-07-22 09:34:40
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Previous:From: Hal SnyderDate: 1998-07-22 04:35:40
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Peter T MountDate: 1998-07-22 05:47:26
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] jdbc plain password support
Previous:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-07-22 05:03:29
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Win32 version of the psql library

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group