From: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change |
Date: | 1998-07-22 05:22:31 |
Message-ID: | 199807220522.OAA19383@srapc451.sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
>At 11:32 AM 98.7.13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumnus(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
>>> Should we ask Tatsuo to do some mixed-endian tests, or is
>>> that area completely unchanged from v6.3?
>>
>>I don't think I broke anything in that regard ... but more testing is
>>always a good thing. If Tatsuo-san can spare the time, it would be
>>appreciated.
>
>Ok, I think I can start the testing next week.
I did some cross-platform testing today against 7/18 snapshot. The
platforms tested are:
1. Sparc/Solaris 2.6
2. PowerPC/Linux
3. x86/FreeBSD
4. x86/Linux
They workd fine!
P.S.
I noticed that 6.4 client did not talk to 6.3.2 server.
[srapc451.sra.co.jp]t-ishii{157}
Connection to database 'test' failed.
Unsupported frontend protocol.[srapc451.sra.co.jp]t-ishii{158}
I thought that we have kept the "backward compatibility" since we
introduced "protocol version" in libpq?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | JohnDz | 1998-07-22 09:34:40 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux] |
Previous Message | Hal Snyder | 1998-07-22 04:35:40 | Re: [HACKERS] cidr |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-07-22 05:47:26 | Re: [INTERFACES] jdbc plain password support |
Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-07-22 05:03:29 | Re: [INTERFACES] Win32 version of the psql library |