Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] cidr

From: Paul A Vixie <vixie(at)vix(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Date: 1998-07-21 04:51:27
Message-ID: 199807210451.VAA04271@bb.rc.vix.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Also, I would assume we can handle old-style non-cidr address just as
> cleanly, so both cidr and non-cidr can use the same type and functions.

the implementation i sent around yesterday does this just fine.  or rather
it makes useful assumptions if no "/" is given, and it always prints the "/".

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-07-21 04:53:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Previous:From: Paul A VixieDate: 1998-07-21 04:44:45
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group