Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc
Date: 1998-07-18 14:59:10
Message-ID: 199807181459.KAA09419@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> ... because the conditional structure assumes that pgsql will only be
> built with non-gcc compilers on HPUX.
>
> This is an entirely bogus assumption not only for HPUX, but for any
> other architecture that has gcc available.
>
> To be able to compile, I just duplicated the "#if defined(__hpux)"
> block into the "#if defined(__GNUC__)" part of the file, but that's
> a pretty grotty hack. I think that the right way to structure the
> file is just this:

I have moved platforms that have have common code for gcc and non-gcc to
their own section of s_lock.h. Should make things easier.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Massimo Dal Zotto 1998-07-18 15:32:32 Re: [HACKERS] two records with same oid, freak accident?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-18 14:50:54 Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc