> Yeah, I've rethough about it and it does seem a bit out-there ;) ... I'm
> sure there was one time where I encountered a situation where you would
> want to use the \d? commands in an SQL statement environment but I can't
> even begin to remember... so maybe it wasn't that important afterall and
> regex'ing will do just fine.
> 
> I do feel though that the \df <regex> functionality would be useful in
> other catalog queries (thank james, I didn't know that what they were
> called) e.g. \do <regex> or \dt <regex> (which would get you all tables
> containing <regex> e.g. titles, tileauthors, titleditors etc, as opposed to
> \d titles which would get you just table titles).
> 
> or am I being dim again? [that dreaded feeling of posting something really
> stupid...]

I think these are good ideas.  I will implement them for 6.4.  Glad you
are using the new features.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

• Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? at 1998-07-08 11:36:56 from Stuart Rison

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Thomas G. Lockhart	Date: 1998-07-09 04:41:21
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 1998-07-09 03:32:35
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Peter T Mount	Date: 1998-07-09 06:12:22
	Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] pb compiling JDBC interface
Previous:	From: The Hermit Hacker	Date: 1998-07-09 03:17:50
	Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql website