> Hmm.  I find that SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are both already in use for
> communication between backends.  We can't really commandeer SIGURG,
> either, because it's apparently the same as SIGUSR1 on SCO
> (see src/include/port/sco.h ... so OOB wouldn't work there anyway!).
> 
> All three of SIGINT, SIGHUP, SIGTERM currently do the same thing in a
> backend, so it looks like our best choice is to redefine one of those
> as the cancel request signal.  Any preference?
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> 

I like SIGQUIT.  Looks to be unused.  SIGINT is used too much from the
command line, and SIGTERM used too much from scripts (the default kill
arg.)


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

• Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? at 1998-07-06 22:18:49 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Stuart Rison	Date: 1998-07-07 18:12:45
	Subject: Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"?
Previous:	From: Thomas G. Lockhart	Date: 1998-07-07 15:15:39
	Subject: Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union