> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom, just wondering were we are with this. Can you update libpq.3?
> Will do. I've been busy with other stuff and have not had time to spend
> on pgsql, but will try to push it up the priority list.
> > Are the sgml sources updated with the protocol changes?
> Yes, those are done. I had been hoping not to have to update libpq.3
> manually, that's all...
> > Also, are these items completed? How about our cancel query key? I
> > think it is random/secure enough for our purposes. Can you make the
> > changes, or do you need changes from me?
> I haven't looked to see what's been done there --- have you finished an
> initial implementation, or is the cancel-via-postmaster-instead-of-OOB
> change still just at the talk stage? I can handle the libpq end of it,
> but feel less secure about modifying the postmaster.
Perhaps you can work up a patch, and I can review it, or give ideas on
how to proceed. The actual protocol layers in the postmaster,
especially for authentication, are very hard for me to understand.
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Maclean||Date: 1998-07-06 06:15:07|
|Subject: postgresql snapshot on ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-07-06 01:34:39|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes|
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Dirk Lutzebaeck||Date: 1998-07-06 08:52:29|
|Subject: Staroffice? Was: [INTERFACES] ODBC on unix?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 1998-07-05 16:05:55|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes |