Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ccb(at)pubweb(dot)net (Charles Bennett)
Cc: ccb(at)pubweb(dot)net, sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error
Date: 1998-06-20 03:01:21
Message-ID: 199806200301.XAA05876@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> 
> 
> Bruce Momjian said:
> 
> > I just applied this patch a few days ago.  I e-mailed you asking why
> > there is an option for this behavour.  Seems like it should always be
> > on.
> > 
> > Please let me know.
> 
> 
> Sorry I missed the mail...
> 
> I set this up as an option because I though the initial behavior
> might have been put in for a reason - one that I didn't understand.
> I have no objection if you decide to make PGSQL-compatible dump
> syntax the default.

Done.


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Keith ParksDate: 1998-06-20 13:06:30
Subject: s_lock.h problem on S/Linux
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-06-20 02:58:43
Subject: Re: bug with prune_joinrel() in 6.3.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group