Re: [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ccb(at)pubweb(dot)net (Charles Bennett)
Cc: sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error
Date: 1998-06-17 22:54:45
Message-ID: 199806172254.SAA06193@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>
> I (thought I) forwarded fixes for the pg_dump constraint syntax
> bug to this list a couple of weeks ago. I added a -c (compatible)
> switch to pg_dump to force it to dump constraints in a syntax that
> pgsql can understand.
>
> Here's another copy of the diffs (against 6.3.2).
>

I just applied this patch a few days ago. I e-mailed you asking why
there is an option for this behavour. Seems like it should always be
on.

Please let me know.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksey Dashevsky 1998-06-18 09:56:13 Non-functional update, only first update is performed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-06-17 22:43:25 Re: AW: [HACKERS] using a btree index in order by clause?