Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: AW: [HACKERS] using a btree index in order by clause?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] using a btree index in order by clause?
Date: 1998-06-17 22:43:25
Message-ID: 199806172243.SAA05955@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> 
> I think these are big win too.
> 
> By the way, max(), min() would be optimized in the same way, I guess.
> 
> >The biggies also use this access method.
>      ~~~~~~~do you mean commercial RDBMSs?

I have modified the TODO list:

* Use indexes in ORDER BY for restrictive data sets, min(), max()(Costin Oproiu)


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-06-17 22:54:45
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-06-17 19:27:04
Subject: lost my e-mail

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group