Vadim Mikheev said:
> Brandon Ibach wrote:
> > Hmmm... well, the table may be 57 Meg, but then, the backend
> > running the vacuum has consumed 5 1/2 hours of CPU time so far, and
> > still going strong, so something tells me there may be something
> > deeper. :)
> Did you have any indices for this table ?
Nope... no indices at all.
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Brandon Ibach||Date: 1998-06-10 01:37:40|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt?|
|Previous:||From: David Gould||Date: 1998-06-09 23:09:26|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention|