Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] some more rambling on the new fe/be communication

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] some more rambling on the new fe/be communication
Date: 1998-06-04 23:46:09
Message-ID: 199806042346.TAA05819@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> As far as the TCP protocol is concerned, yes.  A lot of libraries that
> you might want to use do not have an API that accounts for the separate
> "OOB" channel within one TCP connection, so it may be difficult or
> impossible to get at TCP's OOB facility from within a particular
> programming environment.  But that's not exactly a cross-environment
> compatibility problem, it's just a missing feature in a library API.
> Any two implementations that both handle OOB should be able to
> communicate.

Looks like we will be removing OOB in favor of a CANCEL cookie sent to
the postmaster.  I will work up something soon.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: USA Publishing Co.Date: 1998-06-05 00:43:37
Subject: Wanted Home Product Assemblers
Previous:From: Chris OlivierDate: 1998-06-04 23:25:06
Subject: (no subject)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group