Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Lots 'o patches

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould)
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Lots 'o patches
Date: 1998-06-01 04:27:45
Message-ID: 199806010427.AAA24654@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Ooops. I guess we need to add "make a useful upgrade procedure" to our
> todo list. I am not picking on this patch, it is a problem of long standing
> but as we get into real applications it will become increasingly
> unacceptable.

You don't like the fact that upgrades require a dump/reload?  I am not
sure we will ever succeed in not requiring that.  We change the system
tables too much, because we are a type-neutral system.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-06-01 04:53:21
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Query cancel and OOB data (fwd)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-06-01 04:12:34
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group