| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould) |
| Cc: | phil(at)river-bank(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes |
| Date: | 1998-05-22 14:16:49 |
| Message-ID: | 199805221416.KAA28991@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> Database customers at least in the commercial world can be incredibly
> conservative. It is not at all uncommon to have large sites running DBMS
> engines that are three major releases (ie, well over three years) old.
> Once they get an app working, they really don't want anything to change.
And, oh yea, we kept database compatability, thanks to Tom Lane.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-05-22 14:17:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-05-22 14:16:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1998-05-22 14:49:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-05-22 14:16:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes |