Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould)
Cc: phil(at)river-bank(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Date: 1998-05-22 14:16:49
Message-ID: 199805221416.KAA28991@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
> Database customers at least in the commercial world can be incredibly
> conservative. It is not at all uncommon to have large sites running DBMS
> engines that are three major releases (ie, well over three years) old.
> Once they get an app working, they really don't want anything to change.

And, oh yea, we kept database compatability, thanks to Tom Lane.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-05-22 14:17:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-05-22 14:16:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-05-22 14:49:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-05-22 14:16:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group