Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
Date: 1998-04-30 15:16:58
Message-ID: 199804301517.LAA14561@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Setting the process title from C is messy, but there is a readily
> available reference.  The Berkeley sendmail distribution includes code
> to emulate setproctitle on practically every platform.  See conf.h and
> conf.c in any recent sendmail release.  Warning: it's grotty enough to
> make a strong man weep.  Don't read near mealtime ;-)

Yep, I have seen it.  Good advice.  What does grotty mean?

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jose' Soares Da SilvaDate: 1998-04-30 15:25:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] drop table inside transactions
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-04-30 15:16:45
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group