| From: | "Julia A(dot)Case" <julie(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC 16 bit support |
| Date: | 1998-04-19 08:50:01 |
| Message-ID: | 19980419085001.49985@MageNet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Quoting Stephen Davies (scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au):
> Not a good example I think. The 16/32-bit ODBC question says nothing about
> dropping features. As I said above, ODBC is ODBC: you either conform or you
> don't. If there happen to be differences between the levels of conformance or
> of performance between 16 and 32-bit models, that would be a pity but not
> earth shattering.
>
But there should be one code tree... With some #ifdef's not 2
seperate code tree's. I think this is the point everyone is making.
Julie
--
[ Julia Anne Case ] [ Ships are safe inside the harbor, ]
[Programmer at large] [ but is that what ships are really for. ]
[ Admining Linux ] [ To thine own self be true. ]
[ Windows/WindowsNT ] [ Fair is where you take your cows to be judged. ]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Davies | 1998-04-19 12:34:14 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC 16 bit support |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-04-19 01:16:22 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver and Dates |