Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance

From: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
Date: 1998-03-19 01:12:48
Message-ID: 199803190112.KAA20929@srapc451.sra.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>imho, even though there is one user forcing arrays of single characters
>by invoking char2, rather than using text and substrings, that is not
>sufficient to keep this obsolete capability in the backend forever.

I agree with you. With the suggestion from Brett, the user now have
better solution than using char2, I think.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-03-19 02:35:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Previous:From: PostgreSQL On Peanuts.roanoke.eduDate: 1998-03-19 01:04:49
Subject: regression testing on linux-elf 2.0.33, postgresql 6.3, i686

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group