From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | matti(at)algonet(dot)se (Mattias Kregert) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Small changes for the "no excuses" release |
Date: | 1998-03-16 02:31:32 |
Message-ID: | 199803160231.VAA19746@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> PostgreSQL seem to have a lot of names;
> Postgres 95, Postgres, Pg, Pgsql ... All these names are used in
> FAQ, filenames, docs, installation info, messages etc.
>
> Examples:
> The backend executable is 'postgres', why not 'postgresql'?
> INSTALL: "User postgres is the Postgres superuser"?
>
> I think it would be a good idea to use only "PostgreSQL" in all
> docs, file names and so on, and "pgsql" as the official abbrev.
>
> This is one of the things new users notice and find strange.
> I know, because I did, and people I know did it too.
Added to TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-03-16 03:07:20 | Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6 |
Previous Message | Brett McCormickS | 1998-03-16 00:46:54 | datetime default 'now' broken? |