Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?
Date: 1998-03-03 05:58:38
Message-ID: 199803030558.AAA21087@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> 
> > I don't see any of these affecting the rewrite system.  They should
> > already have been in the code.  Were they not?
> 
> I recall adding code to print the nodes of a create index statement, and the nodes of a
> table create statement. I don't quite remember which other ones, but everything listed
> below is new since v6.2.1.

I think I added many of these to fixed rule problems.

> 
> > > > _outCreateStmt(StringInfo str, CreateStmt *node)
> > > >       _outNode(str, node->tableElts);
> > > >       _outNode(str, node->inhRelnames);
> > > >       _outNode(str, node->constraints);
> > > > _outIndexStmt(StringInfo str, IndexStmt *node)
> > > >       _outNode(str, node->indexParams);
> > > >       _outNode(str, node->withClause);
> > > >       _outNode(str, node->whereClause);
> > > >       _outNode(str, node->rangetable);


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter T MountDate: 1998-03-03 06:36:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] backend -> interface communication
Previous:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-03-03 05:49:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group