RE: [HACKERS] Current 6.3 issues

From: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
To: "Meskes, Michael" <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Current 6.3 issues
Date: 1998-03-01 02:07:42
Message-ID: 199803010205.LAA12801@meshsv26.tk.mesh.ad.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2:52 PM 98.2.27 +0100, Meskes, Michael wrote:
>But this isn't declared in postmaster.c either. ecpg.c does include
>unistd.h if getopt.h does not exist and I think unistd.h is the one that
>puts the getopt stuff into postmaster.

I see declarations of optarg and optind in backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
around line 216 in Feb 28 snapshot.
---
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Billy G. Allie 1998-03-01 03:10:57 UNIXWARE port patches.
Previous Message Darren King 1998-03-01 00:53:17 Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?