> For now and as long as only superusers are permitted to
> create rules or views due to the pg_rewrite permissions this
> should be ok. But we should change it soon by adding the
> flag to pg_class as I said earlier and have only the view
> owner and superusers permitted to change this flag.
> This flag is useful anyway. We change the world now that ALL
> views are overriding the acl checks. If we have this flag we
> can setup views that behave like before (user cannot see
> anything through the view he cannot see without) and use the
> overriding only in cases we need it (like for the pg_user
> permissions problem). I'll work on it.
This patch is missing changes to the other node handling functions for
rangetableentry. Do you want me to add them?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 1998-02-21 04:38:02|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform status|
|Previous:||From: Ryan Kirkpatrick||Date: 1998-02-21 01:02:23|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Who is everyone?|