Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] fork/exec for backend

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tom(at)sdf(dot)com (Tom)
Cc: goran(at)bildbasen(dot)se, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fork/exec for backend
Date: 1998-01-25 01:36:05
Message-ID: 199801250136.UAA25153@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>   Regardless on the method used, the dynamic executables need to undergo a
> link step during exec().  Linking static reduces that.

True, but the SVr3/BSDI shared libraries set up the jump table in the
binary at binary link time.  It has to map into the shared library at
exec time, but it is a single mapping per shared library, not a mapping
per function or per function call.

-- 
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-01-25 03:50:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright question: GPL patches for non-GPL packages (fwd)
Previous:From: Jan VicherekDate: 1998-01-25 01:11:10
Subject: Re: Browsing the tables / why pgsql does not perform well (with temp fix)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group