| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
| Cc: | darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] varchar(), text,char() overhead |
| Date: | 1998-01-22 01:06:11 |
| Message-ID: | 199801220106.UAA19629@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> I had forgotten about your mention of this. I am running some tests
> now, and things look promising. However, if we go to 64k or 128k
> tuples, we would be in trouble. (We can do 64k tuples by changing the
> 'special variable' length value from -1 to 0.
>
I am not going to make any changes to the variable length overhead for
char(), varchar(), and text at this time. It is too close to beta. I
will keep the item on the TODO list, and we can hash it out later.
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim B. Mikheev | 1998-01-22 02:40:30 | Re: [HACKERS] varchar(), text,char() overhead |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-01-21 23:38:07 | Re: [HACKERS] varchar(), text,char() overhead |