Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Date: 2001-12-29 20:58:52
Message-ID: 19881.1009659532@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Another question: Is there a way to release buffer locks without
> aquiring the master lock?

We might want to think about making bufmgr locking more fine-grained
... in a future release. For 7.2 I don't really want to mess around
with the bufmgr logic at this late hour. Too risky.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-29 21:09:56 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-29 20:56:33 Re: TODO question

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-29 21:09:56 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-29 20:49:33 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem