Re: ~* + LIMIT => infinite time?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: typea(at)l-i-e(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ~* + LIMIT => infinite time?
Date: 2002-12-14 04:48:38
Message-ID: 19877.1039841318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> You'll get a snarky response, and then be told to upgrade, if you try to
> submit a bug in 7.1.3.

7.1 is a tad long in the tooth, but still I'm curious about this. I
don't see how <plan A> can possibly take longer than <plan A> + <LIMIT
node on top>.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2002-12-14 19:46:16 Re: automated index suggestor -- request for comment
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-12-14 02:23:32 Re: ~* + LIMIT => infinite time?