| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |
| Date: | 2006-08-28 23:20:57 |
| Message-ID: | 19854.1156807257@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> OK, got it. I just don't see the value to doing \g and not ;. I think
> the \gc case was a hack when he didn't have \set. Now that we have
> \set, we should be consistent.
I'm willing to accept this if we can make sure we aren't adding any
overhead --- see my proposal elsewhere in the thread for fixing that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Mair | 2006-08-28 23:31:04 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 23:18:37 | Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Mair | 2006-08-28 23:31:04 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-28 23:08:07 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |