Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
>> xmlagg -> concatenates values to form xml datum
>> array_agg -> concatenates values to form array datum
>> ??? -> concatenates values to form string datum
>> So it's pretty clear that listagg does not fit into this scheme.
> when you define list as text domain, then this the name is correct.
IOW, if you define away the problem then there's no problem?
I agree that "list" is a terrible choice of name here. "string_agg"
seemed reasonable and in keeping with the standardized "array_agg".
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-01-25 14:12:37|
|Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-01-25 13:56:53|
|Subject: Fwd: Questions about connection clean-up and "invalid page header"|