Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
From:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc:
pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
Date:
2011-09-06 20:04:24
Message-ID:
19783.1315339464@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2011-09-06 02:09:02 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2011-09-06 20:04:24 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2011-09-06 20:39:09 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2011-09-06 21:07:56 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2011-09-06 21:19:02 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-committers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
> session-local objects.
This comment seems inaccurate and bizarrely placed. What question
were you trying to answer?
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-committers by date
Next :From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-06 20:07:00
Subject : pgsql: Correct ancient logic mistake in assertion
Previous :From : Bruce MomjianDate : 2011-09-06 19:21:04
Subject : pgsql: Fix plpgsql "PERFORM" markup.